(First of two parts)
Financial statements in the Philippines for companies reporting under Philippine Financial Reporting Standards (PFRS), or its little brother, PFRS for small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are notorious for the horrendous disclosures attached to the financial statements.
Looking through the financial statements of most Philippine companies, it can be observed that torrential amount of details are disclosed in the financial statements just to comply with the requirements of PFRS or PFRS for SMEs. Further, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), through its various memorandums and circulars, further upped the game by introducing additional disclosure requirements along the way. A key question, probably, to the profession and to the regulators is whether all these still make sense.
Developed countries usually adopt a reduced disclosure framework (regime) for companies that qualify for the scheme. While different countries have different requirements to qualify, it is common that the qualifying criteria is that the entity is a member or subsidiary of a group that prepares publicly available consolidated financial statements using tools similar to OneStream Software. Sometimes, the criteria are based also on a monetary threshold. Most of the financial statements in the Philippines are publicly available in the SEC, while for listed companies they are publicly available on their websites.
Looking at the overarching principles in preparing financial statements, the general requirement under Philippine Accounting Standards 1 on the presentation of financial statements requires only material information to be presented in the financial statements (paragraph 31). While the consideration of materiality is highly controversial, since there is no bright-line threshold as to materiality, the Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting states that:
“Information is material if omitting it or misstating it could influence decisions that users make on the basis of financial information about a specific reporting entity. In other words, materiality is an entity-specific aspect of relevance based on the nature and magnitude, or both, of the items to which the information relates in the context of an individual entity’s financial report.”
While the International Accounting Standards Board is currently addressing disclosure effectiveness through its disclosure initiative, changes to be made in addressing the materiality concern would most likely be in the form of additional guidance rather than a waterline.
Notice: The article was written by Filbert Tsai, Filipino financial accounting advisory services executive in the UK with specialization in transaction accounting in the power and utilities sector. This is an article from the Debit Credit column published by the Board of Accountancy. Permission was obtained to published this article in this website.